Workplace message

When is a work shift change agreed?

Distinguish a proposal, a colleague's agreement and the approval that makes an arrangement final.

Original fictional practice by YKI Test Prep. Published . Work independently using the explanations provided.

Read the first situation

Two colleagues want to exchange shifts. Read the team's message to find the step that still needs to happen. Agreement between two people is not always the final step in a process.

Workplace message

Voitte ehdottaa vuoronvaihtoa, jos löydätte työkaverin, jolle vaihto sopii.

Lähettäkää yhteinen pyyntö esihenkilölle viimeistään edellisenä päivänä.

Vuoro vaihtuu vasta, kun esihenkilö on hyväksynyt pyynnön.

Siihen asti noudatetaan alkuperäistä työvuorolistaa.

English meaning of the text

You can propose a shift exchange if you find a colleague for whom it works.

Send a joint request to the supervisor by the previous day at the latest.

The shift changes only when the supervisor has approved the request.

Until then, the original shift schedule is followed.

Choose the answer supported by the text

Työkaveri suostui vaihtoon, mutta vastausta pyyntöön ei ole tullut. Mikä tilanne on?

English meaning of the question and choices

Your colleague agreed, but there has been no reply to the request. What is the situation?

  1. The original shift still applies.
  2. The exchange is already final.
  3. Both shifts have been cancelled.
Answer and reasoning for every choice

Supported answer: Alkuperäinen vuoro on vielä voimassa.

Separate the stages: find a colleague, send a request, receive approval. The reader has completed only the early stages. Vasta, kun makes approval the condition for the change taking effect.

Evidence in the text

Vuoro vaihtuu vasta, kun esihenkilö on hyväksynyt pyynnön.

The shift changes only when the supervisor has approved the request.

Siihen asti noudatetaan alkuperäistä työvuorolistaa.

Until then, the original shift schedule is followed.

Why the alternatives differ

Alkuperäinen vuoro on vielä voimassa.
Approval has not arrived. The final sentence says to follow the original schedule until approval.
Vaihto on jo lopullisesti sovittu.
A colleague's agreement allows a proposal. It does not replace the supervisor's approval required in the third sentence.
Molemmat vuorot on peruttu.
Nothing in the message cancels either shift. This adds a consequence that the text never states.

Follow kun and the main clause. Identify the event that must happen before the main result becomes true.

Notice the language

vasta, kun

only when

This limits when the result takes effect. It prevents you from treating an earlier step as sufficient.

siihen asti

until then

Look backwards to identify the event meant by then. Here it is approval of the request.

A room request is still pending

Apply the same sequence reasoning to a room booking. The important condition is expressed differently.

A different situation

Kokoushuoneen varausta voi pyytää verkkolomakkeella.

Lomakkeen lähettäminen ei vielä takaa varausta.

Voit käyttää huonetta varattuna aikana saatuasi sähköpostivahvistuksen.

English meaning of the text

You can request a meeting room booking using the online form.

Sending the form does not yet guarantee a booking.

You can use the room at the booked time after receiving email confirmation.

Choose the answer supported by the text

Olet lähettänyt lomakkeen. Mitä vielä tarvitset?

English meaning of the question and choices

You have sent the form. What do you still need?

  1. Only your own copy of the form.
  2. A colleague's spoken permission.
  3. Confirmation sent by email.
Answer and reasoning for every choice

Supported answer: Sähköpostilla lähetetyn vahvistuksen.

A request and a confirmed booking are different states. Ei vielä signals that the action so far is insufficient; saatuasi supplies the event that changes the situation.

Evidence in the text

Lomakkeen lähettäminen ei vielä takaa varausta.

Sending the form does not yet guarantee a booking.

Voit käyttää huonetta varattuna aikana saatuasi sähköpostivahvistuksen.

You can use the room at the booked time after receiving email confirmation.

Why the alternatives differ

Vain oman kopion lomakkeesta.
A copy shows what you sent, but the text makes confirmation the necessary next step.
Työkaverin suullisen luvan.
The passage says nothing about approval by a colleague. This imports a detail from a different situation.
Sähköpostilla lähetetyn vahvistuksen.
The last sentence allows use after email confirmation has been received.

Put events in order. Practise explaining which action happens before another without assuming they occur together.

Explain it yourself

Explain to a colleague why sending the request is not enough to change the schedule. Your draft stays on this page until you leave or reload. It is not submitted or automatically graded.

Check your own response
Compare a possible explanation

Olemme lähettäneet pyynnön, mutta vaihtoa ei ole vielä hyväksytty. Noudatamme alkuperäistä listaa, kunnes vaihto on hyväksytty.

We have sent the request, but the exchange has not yet been approved. We will follow the original schedule until the exchange has been approved.

The response acknowledges the action already taken, names the missing step and explains the practical consequence.

Your wording can differ from the example. Check whether it keeps the same meaning and uses evidence from the text. The exercise does not automatically assess your writing.