Reader opinion

Separate an opinion from a current fact

Recognise a proposal, the reasons supporting it and the writer's acknowledgement of a drawback.

Original fictional practice by YKI Test Prep. Published . Work independently using the explanations provided.

Read the first situation

You read a short opinion about a local library. Decide what the writer wants changed. A recommendation about opening hours is not a report of the timetable already in use.

Reader opinion

Lähikirjastoni sulkeutuu lauantaisin jo kello 14.

Mielestäni sen pitäisi olla auki iltaan asti, sillä monet käyvät töissä myös viikonloppuisin.

Ymmärrän, että pidemmät aukioloajat vaativat järjestelyjä.

Silti muutaman tunnin lisäaika helpottaisi esimerkiksi työssäkäyvien opiskelua.

English meaning of the text

My local library closes as early as 14 on Saturdays.

In my opinion it should stay open until the evening, because many people also work at weekends.

I understand that longer opening hours require arrangements.

Even so, a few extra hours would make studying easier for people who work, for example.

Choose the answer supported by the text

Mitä kirjoittaja ehdottaa?

English meaning of the question and choices

What does the writer propose?

  1. Extending the Saturday opening hours.
  2. Keeping the current timetable.
  3. Closing the library at weekends.
Answer and reasoning for every choice

Supported answer: Lauantain aukioloajan pidentämistä.

Find the proposal before evaluating the reasons. Mielestäni and pitäisi identify the writer's desired change. Ymmärrän acknowledges a practical difficulty without abandoning that proposal.

Evidence in the text

Mielestäni sen pitäisi olla auki iltaan asti, sillä monet käyvät töissä myös viikonloppuisin.

In my opinion it should stay open until the evening, because many people also work at weekends.

Silti muutaman tunnin lisäaika helpottaisi esimerkiksi työssäkäyvien opiskelua.

Even so, a few extra hours would make studying easier for people who work, for example.

Why the alternatives differ

Lauantain aukioloajan pidentämistä.
Pitäisi olla auki iltaan asti states the proposed change. The other sentences provide a reason, acknowledge a drawback and explain a benefit.
Nykyisen aikataulun säilyttämistä.
The current closing time is background information. The writer explicitly argues for a later closing time.
Kirjaston sulkemista viikonloppuisin.
Mentioning work at weekends supports longer opening hours. It does not suggest closing the library.

Recognise a conditional proposal. Pitäisi and helpottaisi describe what the writer thinks should happen and its possible benefit.

Notice the language

mielestäni

in my opinion

This marks the statement as the writer's view. It does not establish an official decision.

silti

even so

The writer maintains the argument despite the difficulty just acknowledged.

A proposal about evening buses

Read another opinion and identify its practical recommendation. Watch for a sentence that concedes a drawback.

A different situation

Viimeinen bussi keskustasta lähtee nykyään kello 21.

Vaikka matkustajia on myöhään vähän, yksi myöhempi vuoro auttaisi iltatyössä käyviä.

Toivon, että kaupunki kokeilisi lisävuoroa perjantaisin.

English meaning of the text

The last bus from the centre currently leaves at 21.

Although there are few passengers late at night, one later service would help people who work evenings.

I hope the city would try an additional service on Fridays.

Choose the answer supported by the text

Mitä kirjoittaja haluaisi kaupungin kokeilevan?

English meaning of the question and choices

What would the writer like the city to try?

  1. Ending all evening bus services.
  2. One later service on Fridays.
  3. Moving the current last service earlier.
Answer and reasoning for every choice

Supported answer: Yhtä myöhempää vuoroa perjantaisin.

A concession introduced by vaikka does not necessarily express the conclusion. Follow the text through to the stated proposal and preserve its limited scope: one later Friday service.

Evidence in the text

Vaikka matkustajia on myöhään vähän, yksi myöhempi vuoro auttaisi iltatyössä käyviä.

Although there are few passengers late at night, one later service would help people who work evenings.

Toivon, että kaupunki kokeilisi lisävuoroa perjantaisin.

I hope the city would try an additional service on Fridays.

Why the alternatives differ

Kaikkien iltabussien lopettamista.
Low passenger numbers are a drawback the writer acknowledges, not the change being requested.
Yhtä myöhempää vuoroa perjantaisin.
The final sentence asks for a Friday trial, and the previous sentence explains who would benefit.
Nykyisen viimeisen vuoron aikaistamista.
The requested direction is later, not earlier. The current departure time is background.

Separate a claim from a concession. Practise following the writer's position even when they acknowledge an opposing consideration.

Explain it yourself

Summarise the library writer's proposal and one reason for it without claiming the opening hours have already changed. Your draft stays on this page until you leave or reload. It is not submitted or automatically graded.

Check your own response
Compare a possible explanation

Kirjoittaja haluaa kirjaston olevan auki pidempään lauantaisin. Hänen mielestään se auttaisi ihmisiä, jotka ovat töissä viikonloppuna.

The writer wants the library to stay open longer on Saturdays. In their opinion, it would help people who work at the weekend.

The summary attributes the view to the writer and uses a conditional for the possible benefit. It preserves the distinction between the current timetable and the proposed one.

Your wording can differ from the example. Check whether it keeps the same meaning and uses evidence from the text. The exercise does not automatically assess your writing.